Doctors kill more people than guns & traffic accidents
by Don Harkins
From: "Saul Pressman"
Date: Thu Nov 25, 1999 2:01 pm
Subject: JAMA Stats Tell the Tale
Forwarded by Saul Pressman:
JAMA Stats Tell the Tale (Journal of the American Medical Association)
In the last century we chose the wrong fork in the road with regard to our
health care paradigm.
Most people have been conditioned to believe in what is called the germ
theory of disease -- that germs cause disease. The truth is that germs are
everywhere and they are attracted to and proliferate in
diseased tissues.
Bacteria decompose dead matter. That is their job. For instance, when a tree
dies, bacteria come in and eat the tree and it eventually becomes soil.
Bacteria does not eat a live, healthy tree.
The same thing is true in people -- bacteria are attracted to dead matter.
Therefore, if you have dead matter in your body, bacteria will get to work
decomposing the dead tissue so that it may eventually become soil. Ashes to
ashes, dust to dust.
In the mid 1800s, western medical science had the choice of going one of two
ways. Antoine Bechamp's theory of disease maintained that every living thing
has arisen from the microzyma (the fundamental unit of
the corporate organism ) and every living thing is reducible to the
microzyma. Bechamp believed that microzymas secrete fermentative substances
that aid in digestion in a healthy body and evolve into bacteria when they
encounter dead or damaged cells. This theory has been tested and amplified
by a string of scientists since then, including Carl Edward Rosenow, William
F. Koch, Otto Warburg, Gunther Enderlein,
Royal Rife, Alexis Carrel, Rene Dubos and Gaston Naessens.
Louis Pasteur's competing germ theory of disease maintained that diseases
come into our bodies from outside germs, so that we must fight to kill them.
Bechamp's theory placed all of the responsibility of disease prevention on
the individual and his lifestyle. In a practical sense, there was no money
in that because people would be able to resist disease simply by taking care
of themselves, and would require no store-bought potions.
Western medical science went with Pasteur's theory because it opened the
door which created the world's medical and pharmaceutical industries, and
because it seemed to support Darwin's new theory of survival of the fittest.
Since the 1850s, we have been developing new drugs to attack and kill the
disease invaders and the result has been epidemics of sickness and
disease -- and a very rich and powerful pharmaceutical industry.
Last year, the pharmaceutical industry did $182 billion in drug sales world
wide. In contrast to that figure, it cost approximately $183 billion to
treat adverse reactions from all of those drugs. The following admissions
were taken from JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) :
The top five causes of death in the United States, in order, are:
1) Tobacco
2) Alcohol
3) Medical malpractice
4) Traffic accidents
5) Firearms
According to JAMA, doctors kill more people than auto accidents and guns put
together. With that in mind, one has to wonder why gun control is such a hot
legislative issue when, perhaps, we should be more concerned about doctor
control.
Statistics show that when allopathic doctors are on strike, fewer people die
from disease.
The number of people that doctors kill per day from allopathic medical
malpractice is roughly equal to the amount of people that would die if every
day, three jumbo jets crashed and killed everybody on board.
Just imagine what headlines would result if a chiropractor or a naturopath
accidentally killed just one
patient?
Another JAMA statistic stated that 20 percent of all people who see an
allopath will suffer an iatrogenic (doctor-induced) injury.
Again, according to JAMA, 16 percent of all people who die in the hospital
are determined by autopsy to have died of something other than their
admission diagnosis. In other words, the doctor had no idea what was really
wrong with the patient and, therefore, the patient may have died for want
of appropriate care that would have been subsequent to an accurate
diagnosis.
Another trade publication, American Medical News, stated that 28 percent of
people admitted to hospitals are there because they have suffered an adverse
reaction to prescribed drugs.
Allopaths are miserably losing the battle against viruses and bacteria.
Antibiotics do not work. We need to take a different tack because this is
obviously not working. Only ozone therapy offers hope against the
increasingly resistant 'germs'.
The British Medical Journal Lancet states that only one percent of all
scientific research papers which explore
medicine are scientifically sound. So, if that is true, then not only are
allopathic doctors incorrect in their understanding of the basic nature of
disease, they are basing their conclusions, and therefore their diagnosis
and treatment of people, on flawed science. And it is killing us.