Funneling vs. Rectal insufflation
From: "Saul Pressman"
Date: Wed Oct 11, 2000 12:31 pm
Subject: Re: [oxyplus] Funneling vs. rectal insufflation
Dear El,
There are a couple of things to consider:
1) Rectal insufflation requires an enema before each one. Funneling does
not. Continuous daily enemas are not that great an idea for the bacterial
colony we need in place there.
2) Rectal insufflation is hard to do for a long time. Most people cannot do
30 minutes,
even at 1/32 l/m. Since ozone effectiveness is a result of CT (Concentration
x Time), the time
factor is very important. With funneling, it is easy to do 30 minutes every
time.
3) Results have been excellent with funneling. Our clients have had spotty
results with rectal insufflation, and I believe it is mostly due to #1
above.
4) With funneling there is nothing to throw away after each time. With
rectal insufflation, many people do not want to reuse the catheter.
5) With funneling, the ozone is directed to a specific organ. With rectal
insufflation, the colon is targeted, with extra effect as the ozone spreads
throughout the system in the blood stream. Since the portal vein from the
colon goes directly to the liver, that is where most of the ozone that is
absorbed will end up. That is great for the liver, but not so good if you
want to treat the pancreas, or the kidneys, etc.
6) There are psychological barriers for some people regarding rectal
insufflation. There are no such barriers for funneling.
7) In general, we only recommend rectal insufflation for colitis, ileitis,
Crohn's disease, irritable bowel, or cancer. This is in recognition of
ozone's proximity effect, due to its charge. It will react with whatever it
comes into contact with, so it is important that it come into contact with
the area requiring treatment.
Best of Health
Dr. Saul Pressman, DCh
http://www.plasmafire.com
Join our mailing list and learn about ozone therapy at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/ozonetherapy/